Is it BB's efficiency or something else? http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/17/...ity-cru?icid=sphere_blogsmith_inpage_engadget
Does it have to do with the fact that droid and iphone use their own browsers? I know BB just uses standard mobile sites, which require less data usage than loading a fool page...just a thought
with their recent purchase of webkit, that's sure to change. Edit, they didn't purchase webkit directly, they purchased Torch Mobile, that uses webkit's IRIS browser http://techblips.dailyradar.com/story/rim_acquires_torch_mobile_webkit_browser_for/
It could be the browser, but I think it is also the fact that so many apps for those OS's have immediate internet access versus the BB style apps. I do not think it is so much a question of efficiency, but rather a question of intention or context. The intended use of the majority of BB devices is far far different than the android or apple ones.
I think it's a ploy from RIM to try to get people to buy BB's since they are now 'scared' of losing their market share by faster, more convenient devices...