ok to get off topic on one of first replies.... i looked at exif info on shot no 3... (red and black) fucking eos 1ds mark II at f22 and iso 100, to compensate, it was a 2" shutter...and jesus that shot is crisp and they say focal range was 17mm, so sucker had to be close... why cant they pay me to do that shit?
Wonder what the heck filter they used... looks like a sunny day, so f/22 at ISO100 should be around 1/50th second with no filters.
shot number 3 is definatly fabricated.... still cool but definatly done with some kind of photo editor
shot 3 was touched up in photoshop, but i dont think its a heavy edit. maybe he used some neutral density filters w/ a polarizer, i think polarizer, cause look at the saturation and the way the glare and reflection turned out.... as for ND, that can knock you down a few stops....and get that sorta effect. now the black car seems streched a bit, no? fisheye? but if fisheye, youd need some extension tubes...no? or be in back of car taking shot of two cars behind you.... as for milo....dude, ill be leaving for syria tuesday....ill get enough practice w/ my new toy then....then i can work on shit like that lol
Shot 3 is a stickie mount with a long rod. I got these from another forum I visit and they had a rather large debate about which stickie mounts they liked. From what Ive read, they shoot these shots at low speeds (40mph ish). It is the slow shutter speed that creates the faster looking effect.
Oh, and with the sensation thing, I had no idea you did the same thing lol. Apparently, just turned out that way.