there's something fundamentally wrong with this proof...and it has nothing to do with the actual value of 'a' or 'b'... as long as 'a' and 'b' are equal, the flaw in this proof will lead u to believe '2=1' no matter what u choose as the value of 'a'... find the flaw yet?
well...in the (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)......that would work out to 0=0...cause when you multiply anything by zero...it equals zero....is that right?
More like, you can't DIVIDE by 0... (a-b) where a=b means (a-b)=0, so you can't divide out (a-b) in that expression.
I'll use this proof tomorrow when I'm giving a tour of the new BSL4 labs to journalists. Wait, no I won't...
1 is not equal to 2, so there should be a mistake made somewhere above. At line 4, you need to divide with (a-b), to get it to look like line 5. But that isn't allowed, because (a-b)=0. And you can not divide with 0.
Personliga hemsidor för studerande vid Uppsala Universitet.. WTF. What kind of sites u browsing boy..
haha.. in regards to figuring out that proof. Much easier to determine what site you were browsing and linked to for that picture. From there just keep stepping back till the solution is discovered
That'd translate into: "Personal homepages for students at the Uppsala University." /multi-lingual moose